Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The big compromise

Author: martin fierz

Date: 20:25:29 04/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 09, 2002 at 16:38:30, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>On April 09, 2002 at 16:02:47, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>In order to consistently beat top computers, a human will require BOTH great
>>chess skill and ALSO high "avoid heavy tactics" skill.  One without the other
>>will probably not lead to a human consistently beating the top computers.
>>
>
>I don't agree.
>Since that means forcing too much the game of chess out of its roots...remember
>that chess is enriched by tactics play , avoiding at any cost this kind of play
>means to miss all the magnificent combinations made famous in the past by great
>combinative players like Tal, Steinitz ,etc.
>I tend to agree with GM Huebner that said after his match against Fritz in
>Dortmund that it is not necessary to betray one's style at any costs when facing
>the machine.

tal is famous for his style, but he would have no chance against a machine with
it. many of his amazing sacrifices were later refuted - through long analysis,
but a normal human GM could not refute them with the limited time he had. i
don't remember the actual quote, but tal said something like that he didnt mind
if his combinations were unsound if he won games with them. in a way, tal was
the computer among humans: he was absolutely great at combinations, and when he
got his opponents into his territory, he smashed them. i think roy has summed up
the situation very well in his last post. i also think that GM huebner does not
have to betray his style, because his style is rather on the less combinative
side. this is a reason i am looking forward to the kramnik - fritz match:
kramnik has something close to the ideal style for a human to play computers. he
will hardly have to change a thing. very unlike kasparov.
who probably is the best player against humans, but his style is a bit like
tal's, with brilliant attacks where his opponents do not have his calculating
power. he was an ideal opponent for deep blue.

aloha
  martin




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.