Author: maria clara benedicto
Date: 02:36:59 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
hmmmmmmmmm...... >>"...stuck on other issues that relate to eval-speed, has-hits, tb-hits,etc..... >>....an we often lose the main criteria to determine the strength of a chess program..." to give face to them, "it's the exquisite pain, fatigue, hardships, ecstacy of the journey........." maria clara On April 10, 2002 at 02:48:48, Hristo wrote: >On April 10, 2002 at 01:24:55, Joshua Lee wrote: >3. Kramnik applies the best possible method to determine which of the two >programs (machines) is stronger. He evaluates the actuall chess moves that are >proposed or made over the course of a game. Most geeks, including me, get, >often, stuck on other issues that relate to eval-speed, hash-hits, tb-hits, etc. >... an we often lose the main criteria to determine the strength of a chess >program. Nobody here, on this forum, would be able to sustain a direct assault >in a regulation game against any of the top chess software. Kramnik can and >will! When talking about chess Kramnik (and the like) can prove what thay talk >about, the rest of us should sit back and take lessoons. :-) >Regards, >hristo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.