Author: Hristo
Date: 02:51:35 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2002 at 05:43:09, stuart taylor wrote: >Another reason why Deeper Blue may well be weaker than ANY of todays programs >(even PDA!), is that there aren't about 1000 test games to prove otherwise. So >we don't know! Indeed ... > Kramnik seems to be violating all need for testing (which should be done) by >playing 1000 games each test. >This logic would seem to follow according to those who claim as above Kramnik makes his comments based on the same data that we have!!! From the available data and comments of the World Champion ... the only thing that I can do is agree with the one that understands _chess_. The other option is to start comparing things like nps which, alone, is not a good criteria to determine strength. Cheers. hristo >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.