Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:45:21 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2002 at 01:37:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 09, 2002 at 20:01:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >I still think that there is a problem. > > >I give the analysis of the programmer again when sjeng never liked to play Rd4 >and got depth 11. > >I also suspect that the only fair way is to replay the game from the first move >and to delete learning files if there are learning files because programs learn >from previous search and pondering also can help because sjeng predicted >33.Qg7. Sjeng can prefer a different move for reasons as simple as a differently sized hashtable, or even a different compiler. Sometimes the phase of the moon even seems to matter ;) The learning files should be no problem; Sjeng stores how deep in the search it got, and uses them accordingly. I've briefly analyzed the game and the loss looks fair and square to me. If you feed the critical position to my program, you'll see it doesn't understand it. Many other amateurs seem to have problems with it, so it's a nice testposition. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.