Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:45:09 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2002 at 23:21:47, James T. Walker wrote: >I see nothing >to indicate that 256 Meg hash is "too big" and causes a Fritz labotomy. I haven't tested it, but I would be surprised if Fritz had _any_ kind of trouble with using huge hashtables for fast timecontrols. Most likely bigger=better, no matter what (*). There was a discussion about the info in the T-Notes a week or so ago, and I think that the general conclusion was that they are occasionally full of nonsense. (*) of course, as long as it actually fits into RAM and no swapping takes place -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.