Author: pavel
Date: 19:49:20 04/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2002 at 16:39:19, Chessfun wrote: >On April 10, 2002 at 16:30:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On April 10, 2002 at 12:24:44, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 10, 2002 at 01:51:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On April 10, 2002 at 01:41:39, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>In game one of the S6 match my Tiger played the losing 14. Bg6 after 134 >>>>>seconds, while in OP 2002 it played the drawing Be6. This just goes to show that game to game any result can and will happen. >>>>>Sarah. >>>> >>>>Hi Sarah >>>>Your comparison is great but as you said "that game to game any result can and >>>>will happen" and for this reason I lately said to my friend: what the hell are >>>>we doing, it's just another tournament, why are we doing so much work for ... >>>>(nothing) ... I could imagine doing some other things in the same time. It >>>>however seems that we are a bit crazy ... >>>>Kind regards >>>>Kurt >>> >>> >>>We are all a little crazy. But your tournaments like this OP 2002 are one of the >>>brighter things here, IMO. Next how about Nunn 2 maybe using a winboard engine >>>also and the latest Crafty. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>A good idea, but have calculated that with 8 programs this would mean 280 rounds >>and total 1120 games!! >>Kurt > > >How about dropping a couple of the current programs in favor of say Yace and >Crafty. Or simply stay with the current six running Nunn 2. > >Sarah. I agree, not many people test crafty and yace nowadays in serious (private) tournaments. There are very much capable, and makes these game more interesting IMO. Also I think using own opening book is a better idea than nunn position (IMO) because from what i see you are likely to have more double games with nunn opening, and only sayd how the above programs are string at this type of positions. cheers. ;) pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.