Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 02:01:31 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
Christophe, >My point was a psychological one: a chess program for Palm can probably be much >stronger than most people here think. Or: the slow hardware of the Palm should >not be regarded with contempt. I agree - especially considering I bought a $1500 Vancouver program in a wooden autosensor board back in 1990. It was then described as a 'Monster' yet the processor was approximately equivalent to the one in the Palm! I guess in 15 years time people will look down their noses (English expression for snobbery) at the 4 GHz PDA that are on then on the market, dismissing them as 'food mixer' type processors. Oh well, the Vancouver gave me a good wipping as does Tiger and Genius - I'm happy!! I would also point out to people that IMO you *play* more chess with a PDA while you *analysis* more with PCs (what's the point of playing Tiger on the PC?). Of course this is just my opinion! Regards, Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.