Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:54:54 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2002 at 17:27:34, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On April 10, 2002 at 16:22:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> Lower-rated players are still looking for that "niche" >>they can play in and do well, and by "thinking outside the box" they manage >>to give computers a lot of trouble... The GMs, however, want to maintain >>their "edge" without diving into new waters, so they tend to play normal chess >>and have their troubles... > >You mean that anticomputer experts also if elo low rated can manage to beat >comps while super gm's playing their normal style are doomed... >I find it rather an oversimplifying concept... anticomps techs are ok, but often >not enough to beat an high rated silicon beast nowadays. I have seen masters and IM players (on ICC) do _far_ better than GM players against computers. Because the humans are ferocious anti-computer players while most GM players are not... > >w.b.r. >Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.