Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 10:52:28 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2002 at 09:54:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 10, 2002 at 17:27:34, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 10, 2002 at 16:22:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>> Lower-rated players are still looking for that "niche" >>>they can play in and do well, and by "thinking outside the box" they manage >>>to give computers a lot of trouble... The GMs, however, want to maintain >>>their "edge" without diving into new waters, so they tend to play normal chess >>>and have their troubles... >> >>You mean that anticomputer experts also if elo low rated can manage to beat >>comps while super gm's playing their normal style are doomed... >>I find it rather an oversimplifying concept... anticomps techs are ok, but often >>not enough to beat an high rated silicon beast nowadays. > > >I have seen masters and IM players (on ICC) do _far_ better than GM >players against computers. Because the humans are ferocious anti-computer >players while most GM players are not... > > At some point in time, hopefully (and the sooner the better, because computers are getting stronger every month), a super-GM will also become ultra-savvy on how to play anti-computer chess. THEN it will get interesting!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.