Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:34:56 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2002 at 13:31:21, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On April 11, 2002 at 12:59:59, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 11, 2002 at 11:31:00, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >> >>>On April 11, 2002 at 11:17:41, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On April 11, 2002 at 11:12:26, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>>> >>>>>>... >>>>>>The Score so far is W=2 L=0 D=0 out of ten games, CTP 14.9 only needs 1 MORE ! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps, I'd better keep my mouth shut. -:) >>>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>Uli >>>> >>>>Note that these games were 40 moves/30 minutes and 40 moves/40 minutes >>>>and not 40 moves/60 minutes. >>>> >>>>40 moves/60 minutes is supposed to help more the palm but >>> >>>I guess that is not what C. Theron believes. >>> >>>Miguel >> >> >>I guess different. >> >>I guess that he believe that slower time control >>helps more the palm because the palm has >>smaller branching factor. > >He said many times that he does not believe in programs that will get relatively >"better" at longer time controls. >I do not agree, but that is what he said. I believe that it migh happen but he >does not. >Maybe we can stop guessing and just ask him :-) > >Miguel I read what he said and you misunderstood him. He was talking about programs that run on the same hardware and in one of his last posts he said that this was often a bad excuse for programs that did not perform well. Here the excuse for the fact that palm tiger is not good at blitz relative to hardware that is 100 times faster is obvious Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.