Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 15:18:01 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2002 at 18:14:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On April 11, 2002 at 17:47:16, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>But here's something else: I don't think it's necessarily a betrayal of their >>style. It might be a small modification of their preferred move at certain >>junctures, but a complete betrayal of their style is probably overstating what's >>necessary IMHO. > >Deep closed positions as we have seen in Gulko's Match are not the result of >changing some moves at junctures , but a completely "new way of playing style" >for GM Gulko, he was unrecognizable in those games IMHO, he was playing >completely passive and moreover he lost too... > I'm not sure "deep closed positions" are the only types that will ultimately work for GMs. There are happy mediums (media??) between those and wild tactical positions. As always, I could be wrong. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.