Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 05:59:54 04/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2002 at 07:40:04, Dan Andersson wrote: >I would like Intel to re-implement the proposed P4. It had more of everything, >and give it a new FP. But the P4 is inherently flawed, IMO. It relies too >heavily on its SIMD instructions to get anything like real performance. It in >effect has an on chip DSP, and that DSP is very limited. > >MvH Dan Andersson That's interesting, what did Intel originally propose for the P-4 processor? If you wouldn't mind Dan, as you have knowledge in this area, could you write a list of what changes the P-4 needs to bring it up to "Speed" so it would become the so-called "Cutting Edge" technology Intel _claims_ it to be? Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.