Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:51:24 04/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2002 at 14:44:37, martin fierz wrote: >just looking through and hoping i counted right in my feverish state: 34 games >total, 9 wins, 12 losses, 13 draws. >played against a combination of fritz7, shredder paderborn, junior 7, gambit >tiger 14.6, chess tiger 14.6 and shredder 6. thank you martin. i was to lazy myself. >comparing with the ssdf list > >1 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2748 >2 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2714 >3 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2709 >4 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2708 >5 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2706 >6 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 >7 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2680 > >you can see that the average rating according to ssdf of the opponents is >something like 2720 (i should weight it according to the number of games played >by each engine, but i'm too lazy for that...). win% 45.6 =-31 elo, ergo >performance of century macheide = 2689. with a huge margin of error, so thorsten >would have to play many more games :-) > >aloha > martin i stopped when one DDR-RAM was down to the heavy usage :-)) now i have exchanged this part. i can continue playing. but i wanted first ed's idea about the styling. IMO its stronger than century4. we have different opinions about this. we will see what we can make out of this. it's just a little tuning in the time when you have nothing to do.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.