Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 13:48:31 04/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2002 at 13:34:49, Roy Eassa wrote: >On April 12, 2002 at 13:05:58, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On April 12, 2002 at 10:55:01, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>Maybe someday tens of thousands of hours will be spent by GMs to develop the >>>ability for to win a game that had been played previously only by computers. >>>The human skill of beating strong computer chess opponents is still in its >>>infancy. >> >>That's not true, anticomputer techs are well known from long time... >> > > >That is like Philidor saying, in the 1700s, that the correct openings or all >chess strategies are known and will never be improved. (You cannot know what >better techniques will be found in the future!) > Roy, I admire you since you are an "incurable" optimist... > >>Yet even this early, there are non-GMs who consistently score well >>>against the top programs. If and when that new skill is improved, spread >>>around, and finally adopted by the top GMs, we may see very different results. >>> >>>Or maybe not. We'll just have to wait and see. >> > >>Programmers are developing powerful anti-gm weapons meanwhile, see e.g. Ed's >>program. > > >I don't disagree with that point at all. I am saying that humans are ALSO >developing powerful anti-computer weapons. I admit to be really interested in this newly found anticomp techs since I know only the classical "repertoire", if you can gimme some hints...that should be greatly appreciated. Regards, Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.