Author: Don Dailey
Date: 08:57:01 07/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 1998 at 11:48:59, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi Danniel: >In this, like in any other field, a tittle is always the result of many >accumulated results, some explicits and some not. It's clear that just to be >part of a GM tournament an so to be capable of becoming a GM you must be at >least an IM invited to be there. And to get 2500 elo you need to win many times >people with or around that rating. So, in the case of Fritz, he will deserve the >tittle if he can obtain the same kind of steady, regular results any human >player need to be tittled as GM. To win here or there is not enough and at most >is a sign that it could be a GM, If he try to be. In other words, we must not >mix the meaning of being GM, a formal tittle given according certain scores >under certain rules, and being capable of being a GM. I think last version of >Fritz -stronger than the first by a wide margin, I believe- could be capable at >least to be IM. >Fernando It would be nice if there was such a title of computer GM. It should be based on games against humans and not be subject to too much manipulation. There are so many logistical problems involved I don't know if this could happen. - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.