Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 03:15:28 04/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2002 at 20:47:35, martin fierz wrote: >On April 12, 2002 at 20:25:01, Mike S. wrote: > >>On April 12, 2002 at 17:30:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On April 12, 2002 at 17:05:45, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Todays top micros must be pure Genius next to Deep Blue as Deep Blue needed >>>100X to 1000X the NPS that the top micros needed to play about as well. >>> >>>Good point, Mark. >> >>I also wonder why everybody seems to talk NPS. I talk ply depth. > >which would be all right if fritz was really doing the ply it tells you it's >doing. with DB, you knew it had looked at everything. with fritz, this is not >the case... > >aloha > martin > Hi,Martin You are right , DB made an exhaustive search using a brute force approach, but there lies the smartness of selective search algorithms of new pc programs: they can achieve *almost* the same results without examining the full tree. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.