Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:06:25 04/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2002 at 10:40:38, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: I just opened up my friend's computer and realized that It have a Pentium 166 Mhz, instead of of P5 90 Mhz, when I asked him he told me that he thought it was 90 Mhz but he wasn't sure, since he bought it used several years from a coworker. Anyway it took me less than two minutes to opened up his computer to check it. He had it on his baseman for over two years when he decided to replace it with an AMD Athlon 700 Mhz >This is the analysis of Comet B.42 CB native on K6/450 for 2 minutes >without book in the position of game #3 after 12...e6 > >Ne5 has never been the best move. I don't know why it played that move If you want I can replay the game with your recommended move. > > >New game - Comet B42 >r3kb1r/ppqn1pp1/2p1pn1p/7P/3P4/3Q1NN1/PPPB1PP1/2KR3R w kq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Comet B42: > >13.Bxh6 Rxh6 > -+ (-2.49) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >13.Ne2 > ² (0.38) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >13.a3 > ² (0.41) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >13.Rhe1 > ² (0.49) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >13.c3 > ² (0.66) Depth: 1/8 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 > ² (0.68) Depth: 1/9 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Ng4 > ² (0.43) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >13.Ne4 Nxe4 14.Qxe4 > ² (0.53) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >13.Ne4 Bd6 > ² (0.32) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Bd6 > ² (0.37) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Be7 14.Ne4 Nxe4 15.Rxe4 > ² (0.50) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Be7 14.Kb1 > ² (0.53) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Be7 14.c3 0-0 > ² (0.36) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >13.Qf1 Ng4 14.Ne4 Bd6 > ² (0.38) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >13.Rh3 Ng4 14.Ne4 Be7 > ² (0.39) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >13.Rh3 Bd6 14.Re1 0-0 > = (0.11) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >13.Qf1 Be7 14.Ne2 Ng4 > = (0.12) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 > ² (0.34) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >13.Rde1 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 > ² (0.34) Depth: 5/16 00:00:00 25kN >13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.c3 Kb8 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 > ² (0.39) Depth: 5/16 00:00:00 35kN >13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.Rde1 Bd6 15.Nh2 Bxg3 16.Qxg3 > = (0.25) Depth: 6/20 00:00:01 90kN >13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.c3 Kb8 > = (0.19) Depth: 6/20 00:00:04 245kN >13.Kb1 Bd6 14.Rh3 Bxg3 15.fxg3 0-0 16.Bf4 Qa5 > = (0.09) Depth: 7/25 00:00:06 441kN >13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.c3 Bd6 15.Ne4 Kb8 16.Kb1 Nxe4 17.Qxe4 > = (0.19) Depth: 7/25 00:00:07 497kN >13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.c3 Bd6 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 Nf6 17.Qe2 > = (0.07) Depth: 8/25 00:00:18 1427kN >13.Qe2 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 > = (0.12) Depth: 8/27 00:00:47 3685kN >13.Qe2 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 16.c3 Qd5 17.g3 Nxh5 18.Qxe6 > = (-0.02) Depth: 9/27 00:00:56 4501kN >13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.Kb1 Bd6 15.Ne2 Kb8 16.c3 Nd5 > = (0.07) Depth: 9/27 00:01:06 5296kN > >(, MyTown 13.04.2002) > > >Enforcing 13. Ne5, Comet evaluates the position as better for >black (difference to above is 1/3 to 1/2 pawn). See below. > >I doubt very much that Comet B.42 will play Ne5 in this position, >unless it had been forced to. > >Are you using some older version ? I downloaded from Chessbase.com >New game - Comet B42 >r3kb1r/ppqn1pp1/2p1pn1p/4N2P/3P4/3Q2N1/PPPB1PP1/2KR3R b kq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Comet B42: > >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 > ³ (-0.30) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Nxh5 > = (0.14) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Bd6 14.Nxd7 Bxg3 > = (-0.05) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Nb6 14.Qb3 Nxh5 > = (-0.13) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Nb6 14.Qb3 > ² (0.64) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Bd6 14.Nc4 > = (0.17) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 > = (0.14) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 > ³ (-0.30) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 > ³ (-0.30) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Qe3 Nd5 > ³ (-0.42) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 > ³ (-0.42) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 17kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Rhd1 Qg4 > ³ (-0.55) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 73kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Nxh5 > ³ (-0.55) Depth: 6/18 00:00:01 79kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Qd2 Nd5 17.Qxf4 Nxf4 > ³ (-0.58) Depth: 7/20 00:00:02 230kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Bd4 Bd6 18.Bxg7 Qxf2 > ³ (-0.44) Depth: 8/20 00:00:03 317kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Bb4 > ³ (-0.44) Depth: 8/24 00:00:10 1033kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Rhe1 Qd5 16.Rxe6+ Qxe6 17.Re1 Qxe1+ 18.Bxe1 Nxh5 > ³ (-0.44) Depth: 9/27 00:00:16 1591kN >13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qg5+ 16.Kb1 Nd5 17.Bd4 Be7 18.Qb3 b6 19.Qa4 > ³ (-0.34) Depth: 10/33 00:00:43 4330kN > >(, MyTown 13.04.2002) > >I also think, that you should perform regular games starting with move 1, >switching colors after each game. I Only wanted to see if longer time control benefit CTP 14.9 for Palm, therefore I tested it using the same 6 opening move. > >Otherwise, the match looks like manipulated to me. Yes manipulated in the sense that I wanted to test a different time control without having to start a new game. > > >Sorry, >Uli
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.