Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:12:13 04/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2002 at 12:06:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 13, 2002 at 10:40:38, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > > >I just opened up my friend's computer and realized that It have a Pentium 166 >Mhz, instead of of P5 90 Mhz, when I asked him he told me that he thought it was >90 Mhz but he wasn't sure, since he bought it used several years from a >coworker. Anyway it took me less than two minutes to opened up his computer to >check it. He had it on his baseman for over two years when he decided to replace >it with an AMD Athlon 700 Mhz PS: The three games that I have played thinking it was a P5 90, in reality was a Pentium 166 Mhz. Sorry for the misinformation. I decided to check the computer that I borrowed from my friend after I received an E-mail from Ulrich, and also I realized that it was reaching depth from 9 up to 12 in some position. Pichard. >>This is the analysis of Comet B.42 CB native on K6/450 for 2 minutes >>without book in the position of game #3 after 12...e6 >> >>Ne5 has never been the best move. > >I don't know why it played that move If you want I can replay the game with your >recommended move. >> >> >>New game - Comet B42 >>r3kb1r/ppqn1pp1/2p1pn1p/7P/3P4/3Q1NN1/PPPB1PP1/2KR3R w kq - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Comet B42: >> >>13.Bxh6 Rxh6 >> -+ (-2.49) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>13.Ne2 >> ² (0.38) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >>13.a3 >> ² (0.41) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>13.Rhe1 >> ² (0.49) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>13.c3 >> ² (0.66) Depth: 1/8 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 >> ² (0.68) Depth: 1/9 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Ng4 >> ² (0.43) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>13.Ne4 Nxe4 14.Qxe4 >> ² (0.53) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>13.Ne4 Bd6 >> ² (0.32) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Bd6 >> ² (0.37) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Be7 14.Ne4 Nxe4 15.Rxe4 >> ² (0.50) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Be7 14.Kb1 >> ² (0.53) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Be7 14.c3 0-0 >> ² (0.36) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >>13.Qf1 Ng4 14.Ne4 Bd6 >> ² (0.38) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >>13.Rh3 Ng4 14.Ne4 Be7 >> ² (0.39) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >>13.Rh3 Bd6 14.Re1 0-0 >> = (0.11) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >>13.Qf1 Be7 14.Ne2 Ng4 >> = (0.12) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 >> ² (0.34) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 >>13.Rde1 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 >> ² (0.34) Depth: 5/16 00:00:00 25kN >>13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.c3 Kb8 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 >> ² (0.39) Depth: 5/16 00:00:00 35kN >>13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.Rde1 Bd6 15.Nh2 Bxg3 16.Qxg3 >> = (0.25) Depth: 6/20 00:00:01 90kN >>13.Kb1 0-0-0 14.c3 Kb8 >> = (0.19) Depth: 6/20 00:00:04 245kN >>13.Kb1 Bd6 14.Rh3 Bxg3 15.fxg3 0-0 16.Bf4 Qa5 >> = (0.09) Depth: 7/25 00:00:06 441kN >>13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.c3 Bd6 15.Ne4 Kb8 16.Kb1 Nxe4 17.Qxe4 >> = (0.19) Depth: 7/25 00:00:07 497kN >>13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.c3 Bd6 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 Nf6 17.Qe2 >> = (0.07) Depth: 8/25 00:00:18 1427kN >>13.Qe2 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 >> = (0.12) Depth: 8/27 00:00:47 3685kN >>13.Qe2 Bd6 14.Nf5 0-0 15.Nxd6 Qxd6 16.c3 Qd5 17.g3 Nxh5 18.Qxe6 >> = (-0.02) Depth: 9/27 00:00:56 4501kN >>13.Rde1 0-0-0 14.Kb1 Bd6 15.Ne2 Kb8 16.c3 Nd5 >> = (0.07) Depth: 9/27 00:01:06 5296kN >> >>(, MyTown 13.04.2002) >> >> >>Enforcing 13. Ne5, Comet evaluates the position as better for >>black (difference to above is 1/3 to 1/2 pawn). See below. >> >>I doubt very much that Comet B.42 will play Ne5 in this position, >>unless it had been forced to. >> >>Are you using some older version ? > >I downloaded from Chessbase.com > >>New game - Comet B42 >>r3kb1r/ppqn1pp1/2p1pn1p/4N2P/3P4/3Q2N1/PPPB1PP1/2KR3R b kq - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Comet B42: >> >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 >> ³ (-0.30) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Nxh5 >> = (0.14) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Bd6 14.Nxd7 Bxg3 >> = (-0.05) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nb6 14.Qb3 Nxh5 >> = (-0.13) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nb6 14.Qb3 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Bd6 14.Nc4 >> = (0.17) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 >> = (0.14) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 >> ³ (-0.30) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 >> ³ (-0.30) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Qe3 Nd5 >> ³ (-0.42) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 >> ³ (-0.42) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 17kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Rhd1 Qg4 >> ³ (-0.55) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 73kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Nxh5 >> ³ (-0.55) Depth: 6/18 00:00:01 79kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Qd2 Nd5 17.Qxf4 Nxf4 >> ³ (-0.58) Depth: 7/20 00:00:02 230kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Bd4 Bd6 18.Bxg7 Qxf2 >> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 8/20 00:00:03 317kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qf4+ 16.Rd2 Nd5 17.Bb4 >> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 8/24 00:00:10 1033kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Rhe1 Qd5 16.Rxe6+ Qxe6 17.Re1 Qxe1+ 18.Bxe1 Nxh5 >> ³ (-0.44) Depth: 9/27 00:00:16 1591kN >>13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qxe5 15.Bc3 Qg5+ 16.Kb1 Nd5 17.Bd4 Be7 18.Qb3 b6 19.Qa4 >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 10/33 00:00:43 4330kN >> >>(, MyTown 13.04.2002) >> >>I also think, that you should perform regular games starting with move 1, >>switching colors after each game. > >I Only wanted to see if longer time control benefit CTP 14.9 for Palm, therefore >I tested it using the same 6 opening move. >> >>Otherwise, the match looks like manipulated to me. > >Yes manipulated in the sense that I wanted to test a different time control >without having to start a new game. >> >> >>Sorry, >>Uli
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.