Author: Mike S.
Date: 11:18:59 04/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2002 at 13:57:19, Roy Eassa wrote: >On April 13, 2002 at 13:46:53, Mike S. wrote: > >>(...) >I had read in at least two places (I think one was an article at Chessbase) that >the Blunder Check feature is a LOT better for what most stronger chess players >want to do. > >Please correct me if I misunderstood or remember incorrectly! I must admit I'm not an expert in those automatic analysis functions... I think Blundercheck is different not only in for what it provides analysis for, but also how. The Full Analysis, which I use then and when (but not often), calculates variations "step by step", IOW. the program moves into the variations while creating them. I don't know at the moment, if Blundercheck does this, or just inserts pv/eval. Maybe club players or people who analyse games often, can answer that better? I could more or less only quote the F1 help at this. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.