Author: Chessfun
Date: 04:19:23 04/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2002 at 02:20:51, sean wrote: >On April 14, 2002 at 01:42:42, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 13, 2002 at 21:14:12, sean wrote: >> >>>On April 13, 2002 at 06:38:59, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>On April 12, 2002 at 20:20:46, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>He should check Ed Nemth's >>>>>finding on Fritz 7 and other versions for opening traps Fritz falls for >>>> >>>>I'm not convinced about that, since I saw only games in blitz and not regular >>>>games where often the comps smells the traps thanks to a deepened analysis. >>>> >>>>w.b.r. >>>>Otello >>> >>>I agree, Im not convinced either, just match tiger against fritz, NO DOUBT who >>>would come out on top. just my opinion though. but then again im completely >>>right. >> >> >>There is always some doubt when top programs play each other, "but then again" >>you already know that. >> >>From my rating list all games 40'/40 available on request. >> >>Fritz 7b : 143 (+ 60,= 55,- 28), 61.2 % >>Chess Tiger 14.0 : 10 (+ 2,= 2,- 6), 30.0 % >>Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 10 (+ 1,= 2,- 7), 20.0 % >> >>From the SSDF >>CT14.0 A1200 12-11 >>GT2.0 A1200 10-10 > > > >> >>Sarah. > >Some nice looking results there, fritz 7 on top, well like i said in another >post somewhere fritz 7 is good, I think it will stay there for quite some time. >Looking at the SSDF I see its little bro deep fritz is still way up there, very >nice. Maybe you missed something I post again hopefully this time you'll understand. From my rating list all games 40'/40 available on request. Fritz 7b 006 v Chess Tiger 14.0 +2 =2 -6 Fritz 7b 006 v Gambit Tiger 2.0 +1 =2 -7 From the SSDF CT14.0 A1200 12-11 GT2.0 A1200 10-10 Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.