Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Endgame position

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 09:32:07 04/14/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 14, 2002 at 09:02:37, Sune Larsson wrote:

>
> [D]8/1P3kP1/2P5/2K5/5b2/2B2b2/8/8 w - - 0 75
>
>
> This is from the game Jurasek 2305 - Piza 2290, 1997.
> White can make no progress so the game was drawn here.
>
> Evals from some programs:
>
> Yace        +- 1.96   1.Kb6   Ply 17
> Junior7     +- 2.12   1.Bd4   Ply 22
> ShredderP   +- 2.61   1.Bf6   Ply 19
> CM Nextas   +- 2.66   1.Kb6   Ply 16
> Fritz 7     +- 3.25   1.Ba1   Ply 17
> CT 14       +- 3.98   1.Kb6   Ply 19
>


If the humans were only rated around 2300 and Fritz 7 is rated over 2650, then
Fritz's evaluation of +3.25 (or Tiger's eval of +3.98) must be correct and the
humans' evaluations of +0.00 (drawn) must be wrong.

Surely weak humans of 2300 can't understand more about a position than mighty
machines of 2650+.

Right?

• Re: Endgame position Sune Larsson 09:38:46 04/14/02
  • Re: Endgame position James T. Walker 08:30:36 04/15/02
    • Re: Endgame position J. Wesley Cleveland 17:27:02 04/15/02
      • Re: Endgame position James T. Walker 18:17:47 04/15/02
    • Re: Endgame position Sune Larsson 09:20:27 04/15/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.