Author: Pat King
Date: 11:25:25 04/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2002 at 00:36:07, Will Singleton wrote: [99% snipped because I'm tired of seeing "Pat King said" seven replies after my replies have been snipped out] >btw, thanks for addressing this. I think that people toss around chess terms >that are not well-defined, with resulting confusion. I still think that the >collision term is best defined by Beal, as I have indicated. Two hashkeys >competing for the same table slot, or index, colliding. As you define it, is >really a bug, and should not occur; hence the term is not meaningful. > >Will Why argue about the meaning of a word, as long as that word is defined within a given thread? Is not a rose as sweet, etc, etc? I don't think any of us disagree about what constitutes a bug in this thread, just what to call it! Pat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.