Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 18:30:28 04/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2002 at 15:31:36, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 14, 2002 at 15:15:27, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On April 14, 2002 at 14:55:48, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On April 14, 2002 at 14:45:23, John Merlino wrote: >>> >>>I find this case just too obvious. He's not only asking >>>for a flamewar this Lagerhausen, even worse, he started >>>one. >> >>I agree that his posting was inflammatory, but the only >>one decides whether there is a flamewar or not is YOU. > >I decided to ask for removal of the posting, so it is >obvious i didn't want to start one. Yes. Once the decision is taken, you should accept it. Moderators decided the post should not be deleted. That is it. I hope not to be elected since there are many good ones competing in this election. I mean it. However, if I am elected the people should not expect me to start giving dozens of lines explaining why a post was or was not deleted. It is election week and I want to make that VERY clear. "Judgement call" has to mean something. It is really stupid to elect moderators if later we start complaining about every single decision. Time is valuable, Let's not waste it. 3 moderators took a decision about a silly post. Let's move on. Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.