Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 02:25:03 04/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2002 at 04:24:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 14, 2002 at 16:52:54, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>I have read a lot of thoughts of computerchess written by John Nunn himself and >>i can say he knows very well what computer can do in chess and what not.Do you >>remember he had played in the aegon-tournament? >> >>Thomas > >i read the same articles by nunn, and i think they are silly. >and i was in den haag. i saw him playing against the king. with my own >eyes. > >and i had the feeling he has NO idea about how the king works. > >nunn is impressed when the computer behaves like him. > >a mirror problem. > >thats the same with many strong chess players. > >nunn plays tactics. if a chess program plays tactics with him (as the king did) >he is impressed and gets afraid. > >some chess players get impressed when a chess program plays like >Tal (e.g. Markus Schäfer) others get impressed when a chess program >plays like Petrosian (e.g. Bernd Kohlweyer). > >And you can be sure, the reason is: Schäfer plays like Tal himself, and >Kohlweyer like Petrosian. > >we get all impressed by the things we believe that is OUR SPECIAL FIELD. > >nunn believes he is good in tactics. Hi Thorsten, thanks for your deep thoughts. There is a lot of deep truth in it. It was a pleasure to read your argumentation. Greetings Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.