Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 06:12:07 04/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2002 at 08:28:32, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On April 15, 2002 at 06:01:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >[snip] > >>If you choose an opening that you know that the computer does not play well then >>you play anti computer chess. > >And if you choose an opening that you know that Mr X does not play well/like, >then you play anti Mr X chess. What exactly is the point? :) > >Sargon The point is the position has to be handled by white in this spirit.it makes no difference who is the opponent.The spirit of the position is the master of the decisions and no psychological approach. If you play for example the nemeth-gambit it is right to say you play anti-computerchess because you can´t play so against an human opponent in this position and you know that you are playing not the best moves.But when you play the best moves in a positional game you can´t say you play anti-computerchess.If you do this you ignore the art of chess. TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.