Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:54:36 04/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2002 at 10:37:23, Rafael Andrist wrote: >On April 16, 2002 at 08:39:32, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>1) Would there be any advantage to my hash entries being 16 bytes instead of 14 >>bytes? I'm thinking of possible alignment issues. The fact that I can have more >>if they're only 14 bytes is irrelevant for me. > >I think you will have to reorganize your datastructure so that several >14-bits-segments fit into a 8*n-segment (or 16*n, 32*n, 64*n - compiler >dependent). > >>2) (For the Microsoft/Windows buffs) Is it possible to allocate more than 256M >>in a contiguous chunck under older Windows versions? > >Under Win2000 with 1 GB RAM, I was able to allocate (malloc) around 900 MB, I >wasn't able to allocate significantly more on a system with 2 GB. I haven't >tried with other MS OS. Because this was for Nalimov-TB-Cache, I don't know >wheter this is an OS dependent limit or caused by Nalimovs code. > >Rafael B. Andrist An application can request up to 2GB of with malloc(). And it works in Windows 95/98 too. Or were you talking about 3.1?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.