Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:16:52 04/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2002 at 00:04:29, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 16, 2002 at 17:08:56, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On April 16, 2002 at 11:55:24, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>>On April 16, 2002 at 10:29:47, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Sorry for the bad news, but my friend asked me yesterday to return his old >>>>Pentium MMX 166 Mhz computer, since his wife decided to donate it to a local >>>>school. I noticed that this old Pentium MMX 166 Mhz was almost as fast as a >>>>Pentium MMX 200 Mhz. >>>> >>>>Pichard >>> >>>Never mind. I guess that the hardware difference was way larger than originally >>>intended in this match. >>>IMHO, the tiger did very well in spite of the large disadvantage. >>>Anyway, thanks for performing the interesting match, Jorge. >>> >>>Uli >> >> >> >>Yep... Could have been worse... :-) >> >> >> >> Christophe > >I thought it could have been much better. >Palm is 54mhz, and compared to 166, it's only around x3, which is very little. >Much less than 1-ply. And isn't the programing of Tiger one of the greatest? >S.Taylor You are wrong by dividing Mhz. Mhz means nothing I am sure that the pentium is more than 10 times faster. palm tiger in the ssdf games searches only some hundreds of nodes per second. I guess that the palm is at least 50 times slower. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.