Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 08:46:16 04/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2002 at 00:44:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >##################################################### >AvP 2002 [Amateurs vs Professionals] >Engine-Engine-Matches under Fritz7-GUI >ponder=off, 32 MB hashtables, 4 men tablebases >each engine with its own opening book >Gambit Tiger 2.0 with book ct.tbk >time control: 40'/40+40'/40+40' >30 games per match; download address to follow >Serie 1 = Yace 0.99.56 UCI >Published by Kurt Utzinger, Switzerland >Report 2 of 17th April 2002 >##################################################### > ><pre> >Match 1.1 >P3 800/32, 2002.04.12 - 2002.04.16 > Score 12345678901234567890 >------------------------------------------------------- > 1: Gambit Tiger 2.0 14.5 / 20 1111==01==111111=0== > 2: Yace 0.99.56 5.5 / 20 0000==10==000000=1== >------------------------------------------------------- >20 games: +6 =7 -7</pre> > > ><pre> >Match 1.2 >P3 650/32, 2002.04.11 - 2002.04.17 > Score 12345678901234567890 >--------------------------------------------------- > 1: Yace 0.99.56 12.5 / 20 =11==11==001=010=111 > 2: Hiarcs 7.32 7.5 / 20 =00==00==110=101=000 >--------------------------------------------------- >20 games: +6 =7 -7</pre> Both sets of results are surprisingly. The first one is incredible in its margin of victory (so far at least), and the second one is surprising in that the underdog is ahead by a good margin. In the Hiarcs match, games 1-7 favored Yace by 5.5 - 1.5; games 8-16 favored Hiarcs by 5.5 - 3.5, and games 17-20 favored Yace by 3.5-0.5. Yet another example of getting very different results by looking at different small sub-matches within a longer match.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.