Author: stuart taylor
Date: 09:08:41 04/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2002 at 01:16:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 17, 2002 at 00:04:29, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On April 16, 2002 at 17:08:56, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On April 16, 2002 at 11:55:24, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>On April 16, 2002 at 10:29:47, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>Sorry for the bad news, but my friend asked me yesterday to return his old >>>>>Pentium MMX 166 Mhz computer, since his wife decided to donate it to a local >>>>>school. I noticed that this old Pentium MMX 166 Mhz was almost as fast as a >>>>>Pentium MMX 200 Mhz. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard >>>> >>>>Never mind. I guess that the hardware difference was way larger than originally >>>>intended in this match. >>>>IMHO, the tiger did very well in spite of the large disadvantage. >>>>Anyway, thanks for performing the interesting match, Jorge. >>>> >>>>Uli >>> >>> >>> >>>Yep... Could have been worse... :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>I thought it could have been much better. >>Palm is 54mhz, and compared to 166, it's only around x3, which is very little. >>Much less than 1-ply. And isn't the programing of Tiger one of the greatest? >>S.Taylor > >You are wrong by dividing Mhz. >Mhz means nothing > >I am sure that the pentium is more than 10 times faster. >palm tiger in the ssdf games searches only some hundreds of nodes per second. > >I guess that the palm is at least 50 times slower. > >Uri If you know, you know! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.