Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Comet B42 MMX P- 166 Mhz Vs CT 14.9 For Palm Ended 4.5-1.5 ?!

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 10:57:01 04/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2002 at 13:54:13, Christophe Theron wrote:


>This is a very precious advice for your future hardware purchases: do not ever
>take MHz as a measure of speed. NEVER.
>
>The DragonBall inside the Palms need approx. 15 clock cycles (average) to
>complete one instruction.
>
>The Pentium needs approximately one clock cycle per instruction (actually I
>think it is 0.9 clock/instruction).
>
>The DragonBall has no L1 cache (not sure it needs one anyway).
>
>The reason for this difference is the number of transistors in each processor,
>and the power consumption.
>
>If you just count the MHz difference, you are going to be 15 times OFF the real
>number.


Doesn't that mean that a 16 MHz Palm is not much faster than a ONE MHz Pentium
would be??  And if so, how in heck can Chess Tiger be so strong on a 16 MHz
Palm??



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.