Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:03:46 04/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2002 at 19:39:00, Slater Wold wrote: >[D]r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Deep Junior 7 - W,S >r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Deep Junior 7: > >1.a5 Rb8 > = (-0.09) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.a5 Qf7 > = (0.10) Depth: 6 00:00:00 12kN >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.a5 Qf7 > = (0.10) Depth: 6 00:00:00 12kN >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.a5 Qf7 > = (0.10) Depth: 6 00:00:00 12kN >1.Qd4 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Qxb4 Nxe4 4.Qxb7 Re7 5.Qxe4 Rxe4 6.Bxe4 > ³ (-0.28) Depth: 9 00:00:00 295kN >1.Qd4 c3 > ³ (-0.58) Depth: 12 00:00:02 3710kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Rxc3 Bxe4 4.Bxe4 Rxe4 5.Nf7+ Kg8 6.Rxe4 Qxe4 7.Rc7 Nd5 >8.Rb7 > ³ (-0.40) Depth: 12 00:00:06 5348kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qf7 4.Nxd5 Nxd5 5.Qb3 Rb8 6.Rf3 Qc7 7.Ba2 Qc5 > ³ (-0.33) Depth: 15 00:00:52 141244kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Re2 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qh5 4.Qd4 Rc8 5.Nxd5 Qxe2 6.Qxg7+ Bxg7 7.Bxg7+ Kg8 >8.Bxh6+ Kh8 9.Bg7+ Kg8 > = (0.00) Depth: 18 00:08:20 1282187kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qf7 4.Ne4 Kg8 5.Ng5 Qxf2 6.Bd4 Qf4 7.Re4 Qf5 8.Re6 >Qxe6 9.Nxe6 Rxe6 10.Bg6 > = (0.05) Depth: 21 02:12:53 3424665kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qf7 4.Ne4 Kg8 5.Ng5 Qxf2 6.Bd4 Qf4 7.Rf1 Qh4 8.Rg4 >Qh5 9.Nf7 Re6 10.Rxg7+ > = (0.25) Depth: 22 05:53:54 2940289kN > >(W, 17.04.2002) > > >Took DTII 6 hours to find this move. > >Takes Ferret (4x450) under an hour to find it, and another 4 hours to show a >score of +1. > >I thought it was pretty impressive, seeing as how DJ7 would play this move in a >blitz game. (It was still failing high when I ended the search.) \ Note that DT found it for the right reason (winning material). DJ is finding it by a simple evaluation term that happens to work well here. The scores obviously show that it doesn't think the move is winning anything...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.