Author: martin fierz
Date: 22:22:04 04/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 18, 2002 at 00:32:36, Joe Little wrote: >On April 17, 2002 at 17:15:46, martin fierz wrote: > >>On April 17, 2002 at 16:10:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 17, 2002 at 05:53:11, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>On April 17, 2002 at 01:56:22, Joe Little wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please do not misunderstand me. GM Smirin is a Great player, one to be >>>>>admired. However I am not all that impressed by his win against Shredder, it >>>>>appears to Me that he basically copied the Van Wely Fritz6 game of 2000. The two >>>>>games are almost identical. >>>> >>>>I had the same impression of yours when I saw the two games, that's >>>>unbelievable! They seem photocopied...but anyway can be just a coincidence. >>>> >>>>w.b.r. >>>>Otello >>> >>> >>>That is yet _another_ problem for computers to address. Book learning and >>>position learning _barely_ scratch the surface of this problem. >> >>...which is what the guys who say "i'm disappointed with smirin's play, he just >>copied van wely" seem to miss - while some program authors claim their programs >>can learn from mistakes, this learning is very very limited! and to otello: it >>is not coincidence that the games are similar. smirin obviously knew van wely - >>fritz. and computers just don't understand that position... and with all their >>processing power they cannot copy ideas, only moves. >> >>aloha >> martin > > > It doesn't take alot of originality to copy a game, but I guess a win is a >win. if it takes so little, why does it take a GM to do it? if everyone could copy a game, why do i lose against fritz all the time? and what exactly does your comment make of opening books, which all progs use? they do nothing but copy moves... aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.