Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:33:40 04/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 18, 2002 at 16:32:35, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On April 18, 2002 at 16:28:00, Martin Andersen wrote:
>
>>On April 18, 2002 at 16:20:52, Chris Carson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>[D]4rr1k/1p2bpp1/5n1p/pPp2P1q/2PpP3/1P1P1N2/6RP/2BQ2RK w - - 0 32
>>>
>>>Ouch, that's gota hurt. GM Smirin is taking DJ to the mat.
>>
>>Yace 0.99.50 1Ghz Athlon:
>>
>>Depth: 13 Nodes: 110517199 (326742 n/s)
>>Score: +1.49 Time: 338.24 seconds
>>1.Rxg7 Rg8 2.Rxg8+ Rxg8 3.Rxg8+ Kxg8 4.Qe2 Bd8 5.Bf4 Kh7 6.Bd6 b6 7.e5 Ng4 8.e6
>>fxe6 9.fxe6 {80}
>>
>>Martin
>
>
>Crafty: 4x700 xeon:
>
> 11 10.13 1.39 1. Rxg7 Rg8 2. Rxg8+ Rxg8 3. Ne5 Rxg1+
> 4. Qxg1 Kh7 5. Bf4 Bd6 6. Ng4 Nxg4
> 7. Bxd6 b6 8. Kg2
> 11 16.63 1.40 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bd2 b6 6. Bf4
> 11-> 19.07 1.40 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bd2 b6 6. Bf4
> 12 23.50 1.47 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Ra2 Qxf1 6. Rxf1 b6 7.
> Bf4
> 12-> 30.02 1.47 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Ra2 Qxf1 6. Rxf1 b6 7.
> Bf4
> 13 38.72 1.40 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bf4 Re6 6. Bd2 b6 7. Bf4
> (4) 13-> 1:52 1.40 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bf4 Re6 6. Bd2 b6 7. Bf4
> (3) 14 2:47 1.56 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bf4 Re6 6. Nd2 Qf5 7.
> Qf3 Kg8
> 14-> 4:07 1.56 1. Qf1 Qh3 2. e5 Nh5 3. f6 Nxf6 4.
> exf6 Bxf6 5. Bf4 Re6 6. Nd2 Qf5 7.
> Qf3 Kg8
>
>Not over, but not nice for black either...
>
>The pressure on the g-file is difficult for a program to understand or
>handle, until it becomes too late and it breaks through.
I think that 32.Rxg7 that was suggested by yace could be better.
I understand that programs may prefer to get a piece for 2 pawns and not a pawn
but I guess that in this case getting the pawn at g7 with positional advantage
is better.
I believe that 32.Rxg7 is the move that most of the humans are going to
play(there is no reason not to simlify the position when you have a clear
advantage).
I would play it because of not seeing that the alternative can win a piece for 2
pawns but even with seeing a piece for 2 pawns(one pawn with simplifying of the
position seems to be better).
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.