Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To: Peter Berger

Author: Ulrich Tuerke

Date: 13:53:04 04/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 19, 2002 at 16:16:44, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On April 19, 2002 at 15:31:03, Peter Berger wrote:
>
>>On April 19, 2002 at 13:21:49, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>Is your match CT 14.9 vs Comet on a 486 DX-50 Mhz almost over YET?
>>
>>Wow, a thread for my own - why didn't you use email ;-) ?
>
>Sorry Peter, don't consider this a thread , just curiousity.
>I do noticed that Comet was optimized for slower processor 386-486 since, it is
>performing much better than against Pentium MMX 166 Mhz. Also I'm not positive
>that CT 14.9 for Palm performs better at slower time control against Comet,
>probably the best performance could be obtained between  G/45 - G/60 Minutes.
>Now it could be that Comet on 486 DX-50 Mhz has an estimated rating between
>2300-2315, just a little bit less than using a Pentium MMX 166 Mhz.
>
>Pichard.

Yes, looks like I should leave my Athlon at home when I go to Leiden and use the
old 486 instead. -:(

Uli




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.