Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To: Peter Berger

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 18:03:44 04/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 19, 2002 at 16:53:04, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:

>On April 19, 2002 at 16:16:44, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On April 19, 2002 at 15:31:03, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>On April 19, 2002 at 13:21:49, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Is your match CT 14.9 vs Comet on a 486 DX-50 Mhz almost over YET?
>>>
>>>Wow, a thread for my own - why didn't you use email ;-) ?
>>
>>Sorry Peter, don't consider this a thread , just curiousity.
>>I do noticed that Comet was optimized for slower processor 386-486 since, it is
>>performing much better than against Pentium MMX 166 Mhz. Also I'm not positive
>>that CT 14.9 for Palm performs better at slower time control against Comet,
>>probably the best performance could be obtained between  G/45 - G/60 Minutes.
>>Now it could be that Comet on 486 DX-50 Mhz has an estimated rating between
>>2300-2315, just a little bit less than using a Pentium MMX 166 Mhz.
>>
>>Pichard.
>
>Yes, looks like I should leave my Athlon at home when I go to Leiden and use the
>old 486 instead. -:(
>
>Uli

No, go ahead and take your Athlon to Leiden, but watch out for some programs
that use a mediocre PC not faster than a 1 Ghz. No I have a better idea, since
MHz MEANS NOTHING, simply take your old 386 with you. -:).

Pichard



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.