Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:47:33 04/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2002 at 21:03:44, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On April 19, 2002 at 16:53:04, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>
>>On April 19, 2002 at 16:16:44, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On April 19, 2002 at 15:31:03, Peter Berger wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 19, 2002 at 13:21:49, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Is your match CT 14.9 vs Comet on a 486 DX-50 Mhz almost over YET?
>>>>
>>>>Wow, a thread for my own - why didn't you use email ;-) ?
>>>
>>>Sorry Peter, don't consider this a thread , just curiousity.
>>>I do noticed that Comet was optimized for slower processor 386-486 since, it is
>>>performing much better than against Pentium MMX 166 Mhz. Also I'm not positive
>>>that CT 14.9 for Palm performs better at slower time control against Comet,
>>>probably the best performance could be obtained between G/45 - G/60 Minutes.
>>>Now it could be that Comet on 486 DX-50 Mhz has an estimated rating between
>>>2300-2315, just a little bit less than using a Pentium MMX 166 Mhz.
>>>
>>>Pichard.
>>
>>Yes, looks like I should leave my Athlon at home when I go to Leiden and use the
>>old 486 instead. -:(
>>
>>Uli
>
>No, go ahead and take your Athlon to Leiden, but watch out for some programs
>that use a mediocre PC not faster than a 1 Ghz. No I have a better idea, since
>MHz MEANS NOTHING, simply take your old 386 with you. -:).
>
>Pichard
Stop this immediately or else I ask Jeroen to dump its fast Athlon and use the
Palm in Leiden (worse: the non-overclocked one). :-)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.