Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 19:54:18 04/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2002 at 22:47:33, Christophe Theron wrote: >On April 19, 2002 at 21:03:44, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On April 19, 2002 at 16:53:04, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>>On April 19, 2002 at 16:16:44, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On April 19, 2002 at 15:31:03, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 19, 2002 at 13:21:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Is your match CT 14.9 vs Comet on a 486 DX-50 Mhz almost over YET? >>>>> >>>>>Wow, a thread for my own - why didn't you use email ;-) ? >>>> >>>>Sorry Peter, don't consider this a thread , just curiousity. >>>>I do noticed that Comet was optimized for slower processor 386-486 since, it is >>>>performing much better than against Pentium MMX 166 Mhz. Also I'm not positive >>>>that CT 14.9 for Palm performs better at slower time control against Comet, >>>>probably the best performance could be obtained between G/45 - G/60 Minutes. >>>>Now it could be that Comet on 486 DX-50 Mhz has an estimated rating between >>>>2300-2315, just a little bit less than using a Pentium MMX 166 Mhz. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>>Yes, looks like I should leave my Athlon at home when I go to Leiden and use the >>>old 486 instead. -:( >>> >>>Uli >> >>No, go ahead and take your Athlon to Leiden, but watch out for some programs >>that use a mediocre PC not faster than a 1 Ghz. No I have a better idea, since >>MHz MEANS NOTHING, simply take your old 386 with you. -:). >> >>Pichard > > > >Stop this immediately or else I ask Jeroen to dump its fast Athlon and use the >Palm in Leiden (worse: the non-overclocked one). :-) > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.