Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: To: Peter Berger

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 00:01:01 04/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 20, 2002 at 00:29:10, Uri Blass wrote:

>The fact that tiger did no progress in the last moves is not a good reason to
>afjudicate it as a draw.
>
>Tiger has KRN vs K and the game should continue.
>
>Maybe tiger does not know to win KRN vs K but the 50 move rule are going to
>force it to sacrifice the knight and get KR vs K that it knows to win.
>
>I do not know about the knowledge of palm tiger but it is one possibility.
>
>Uri

You are completely right and I came to the same conclusion. It was partly a
technical decision as I was really too tired to watch this game any longer. And
I expect exactly the same as you ( the Tiger sacrifices the knight because of
the 50 move rule and then will know how to mate). I think I will let them replay
this endgame (sigh).

Peter

• Re: To: Peter Berger Ulrich Tuerke 10:21:31 04/20/02
  • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 21:17:30 04/20/02
    • Re: To: Peter Berger Ulrich Tuerke 02:32:49 04/21/02
      • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 14:57:18 04/21/02
• Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 08:53:46 04/20/02
  • Re: To: Peter Berger Peter Berger 16:13:50 04/20/02
    • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 21:16:06 04/20/02
      • Re: To: Peter Berger Peter Berger 04:40:08 04/21/02
        • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 14:58:25 04/21/02
  • Re: To: Peter Berger Uri Blass 09:35:04 04/20/02
    • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 21:12:02 04/20/02
      • Re: To: Peter Berger Uri Blass 22:50:34 04/20/02
        • Re: To: Peter Berger Christophe Theron 15:01:20 04/21/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.