Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:14:16 04/20/02
4 normal positions I think Rebel is good, if not superior :-) You are invited to disproof.... =========================== [d]r2q3r/pp1k1pb1/3p3p/3P3n/5Bbp/2N5/PPPQN1P1/2K2R1R w - - 0 1 bm Bxd6; Rebel: 1.7 seconds (depth=5) [d]rn3rk1/1b3ppp/pq2p3/1p1pP3/3RNP2/4Q3/PPP1B1PP/1K5R w - - 0 1 bm Nf6+; Rebel: 4.1 seconds (depth=9) [d]r1bqr1k1/pp1n1ppp/5b2/4N1B1/3p3P/8/PPPQ1PP1/2K1RB1R w - - 0 1 bm Nxf7; Rebel: 3 seconds (depth=8) [d]6k1/8/p3r2p/1p1pPpp1/1n1pP3/1Pq4P/PR4PB/3QN1K1 b - - 0 1 bm dxe4; Rebel: 2.8 seconds (depth=8) A1400/60Mb hash. I will now search for 4 difficult positions Rebel is relative bad, I think. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.