Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:17:45 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 09:49:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 09:38:05, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>4 mate positions I think Rebel is good, if not superior :-) >> >>You are invited to disproof.... > >Nothing more fun than ruining the dreams of a competitor ;) Nice solution times, have you played Sjeng's default version? Ed >>[d]5n2/B3K3/2p2Np1/4k3/7P/3bN1P1/2Prn1P1/1q6 w - - 0 1 id Mate in 30; >> >>Well known, I think. >> >>Rebel: 0.1 second > >0.03 seconds > >Sjeng: prove > >Max time to search (s): 10000 > >P: 0 D: 2000000000 N: 10005 S: 10004 Mem: 0.27M Iters: 286 MaxDepth: 64 >Time : 0.030000 >This position is WON. >PV: e3g4 e5f5 g4h6 f5e5 h6f7 e5f5 f7d6 f5e5 f6g4 e5d5 g4e3 d5e5 d6f7 e5e4 f7g5 >e4e5 g5f3 e5e4 f3d2 e4e5 d2f3 e5e4 f3g5 e4e5 g5f7 e5e4 f7d6 e4e5 e3g4 e5d5 g4f6 >d5e5 d6f7 e5f5 f7h6 f5e5 h6g4 e5f5 g4e3 f5e5 f6g4 e5e4 g4f2 e4e5 f2d3 e5e4 d3f2 >e4e5 f2g4 e5e4 g4f6 e4e5 e3c4 e5f5 c4d6 f5e5 f6g4 e5d5 c2c4 > > >>[d]1b4k1/r4p2/5Pp1/7p/6p1/8/8/2Q4K w - - 0 1 id Mate in 15; >> >>Rebel: 2.4 seconds. >> >>Maybe there is a shorter mate. > >5.8 seconds > >Sjeng: prove > >Max time to search (s): 30 > >P: 0 D: 2000000000 N: 1879698 S: 1879697 Mem: 50.19M Iters: 139957 MaxDepth: 41 >Time : 5.830000 >This position is WON. >PV: c1h6 g4g3 h6g (yes, its borked, the first move is always correct though) > > >>[d]8/8/8/8/8/8/ppQKPPP1/k7 w - - 0 1 id Mate in 12; >> >>Rebel 4.6 seconds. > >0 seconds flat > >Sjeng: prove > >Max time to search (s): 100 > >P: 0 D: 2000000000 N: 601 S: 600 Mem: 0.02M Iters: 36 MaxDepth: 23 >Time : 0.000000 >This position is WON. >PV: c2c3 a1b1 c3d3 b1a1 d3d4 a1b1 d4e4 b1a1 e4e5 a1b1 e5f5 b1a1 f5f6 a1b1 f6g6 >b1a1 g6g7 a1b1 g7h7 b1a1 h7h8 a1b1 h8h1 > >>[d]3b4/p3P1q1/P1n2pr1/4p3/2B1n1Pk/1P1R4/P1p3KN/1N6 w - - 0 1 id Mate in 15; >> >>Rebel 3.6 seconds. > >0.02 seconds > >Sjeng: prove > >Max time to search (s): 10 > >P: 0 D: 2000000000 N: 6011 S: 6010 Mem: 0.16M Iters: 154 MaxDepth: 29 >Time : 0.020000 >This position is WON. >PV: d3h3 h4g5 h3h5 g5f4 h5f5 f4e3 f5f3 e3d4 f3d3 d4c5 d3d5 c5b6 d5b5 b6a6 b5b8 >a6a5 b3b4 a5a4 c4b3 > >Well, that's three to one Ed. You lose. Can you answer my mail now ? :) > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.