Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:19:59 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 09:57:00, Chessfun wrote:
>On April 20, 2002 at 09:51:45, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On April 20, 2002 at 08:21:27, Michael Vox wrote:
>>
>>You combine different rating lists with each
>>other, not so smart!
>>
>>Anyway if you do that anyway, please put in DIEP
>>at 3066, which is its active bullet rating at icc.
>
>
>Active isn't exactly the right term, *restrictive* maybe better.
>Throw open your formula to play computers then see what you get.
>
>Vars diep
>
>(rated&autocolor&(!computer&rating>myrating-600&etime<=45|computer&rating>myrating-300&etime>=45&inc>=1))
>| (unrated & rating > 2000 & !computer)"
>
>Sarah.
I throw open the formula more for humans perhaps in future,
it's getting too high rated indeed, but i won't allow computers
at blitz or bullet ever.
I dislike playing computers in bullet and blitz for 4 reasons
a) diep has no learning most idiots use the blitz/bullet to
get a better learning file then play it at standard with that.
b) i would be playing only a few programs for nearly whole day online
c) at tournaments you only play slow level, so why the hell do i need
to play other levels at icc against them with a random book?
Allowing >= 45 minutes games is already plenty fast.
d) if i want to play computers i can do that at home too
Example of b. Up until a few weeks ago i allowed unrated
games against everyone. No matter rating or computer. then to my
amazement 12 hours a day (out of the around 12 hours a day it is logged
on) it was playing half of them unrated against computers at blitz, bullet.
I find it sick.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.