Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:28:44 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 10:14:16, Ed Schröder wrote: >4 normal positions I think Rebel is good, if not superior :-) >You are invited to disproof.... > >=========================== > >[d]r2q3r/pp1k1pb1/3p3p/3P3n/5Bbp/2N5/PPPQN1P1/2K2R1R w - - 0 1 bm Bxd6; 00:00 0 0 5 (0) 1 -0.076 Bf4xd6 Kd7xd6 Rf1xf7 depth==1 seconds 0.00 >Rebel: 1.7 seconds (depth=5) >[d]rn3rk1/1b3ppp/pq2p3/1p1pP3/3RNP2/4Q3/PPP1B1PP/1K5R w - - 0 1 bm Nf6+; > >Rebel: 4.1 seconds (depth=9) > > >[d]r1bqr1k1/pp1n1ppp/5b2/4N1B1/3p3P/8/PPPQ1PP1/2K1RB1R w - - 0 1 bm Nxf7; > >Rebel: 3 seconds (depth=8) > > >[d]6k1/8/p3r2p/1p1pPpp1/1n1pP3/1Pq4P/PR4PB/3QN1K1 b - - 0 1 bm dxe4; > >Rebel: 2.8 seconds (depth=8) > >A1400/60Mb hash. > >I will now search for 4 difficult positions Rebel is relative bad, I think. >Ed I have several for you Ed where your forward pruning goes wrong or whatever.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.