Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WORLD CHAMPIONS & HIGHEST RATED CHESS PROGRAMS

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 07:58:16 04/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On April 20, 2002 at 10:24:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On April 20, 2002 at 09:31:09, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On April 20, 2002 at 08:21:27, Michael Vox wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>http://www.bwhitby.freeserve.co.uk/ChessRatings.htm
>>>
>>>WORLD CHAMPIONS & HIGHEST RATED CHESS PROGRAMS
>>>
>>>1 Gary Kasparov (1985-2001) 2838
>>>2 Vladimir Kramnik (2001 - present) 2809
>>>3 Robert James Fischer (1972-1975) 2785
>>>4 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz  2748
>>>5 Mikhail Botvinnik (1948-1957, 1958-1960 & 1961-1963) 2730
>>>6 Jose Raul Capablanca (1921 - 1927) 2725
>>>7 Emanuel Lasker (1894 - 1921) 2720
>>>8 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200  2714
>>>9 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2709
>>>10 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2708
>>>11 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2706
>>>12 Mikhail Tal (1960-1961) 2700
>>>13 Alexander Alekhine (1927 - 1935 & 1937-1946) 2690
>>>14 Vasily Smyslov (1957-1958) 2690
>>>15 Boris Spassky (1969-1972) 2690
>>>16 Anatoly Karpov (1975-1985) 2690
>>>17 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684
>>>18 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2680
>>>19 Tigran Petrosian (1963-1969) 2680
>>>20 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2662
>>>21 Max Euwe (1935 - 1937) 2660
>>>22 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654
>>>23 William Steinitz (1886 - 1894) 2650
>>>25 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2649
>>
>>I do not think that Capablanca and Kramnik are comaprable.
>>
>>they lived in different time.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Sure capablanca and kramnik are comparable. Of course capablanca
>will be beaten by kramnik when kramnik gives a simultaneously exhibition
>against a bunch of such players, but let's be realistic:
>
>in athletics they compare records which were run at 100 meters sprint
>out of 1980 with today too when showing a chart how the speed progressed.
>
>Ratings work a bit different than this




 (someone from 2600 now
>is way better than someone 2600 from 20 years ago),



 Are you serious about this?!

 That Conquest 2601, Vallejo Pons 2630, Novikov 2588 (2001)
 are "way better" than:
 Petrosian 2585, Spassky 2630, Larsen 2610 (1981)  ????

 Sune





>but still it's comparable.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.