Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 08:47:22 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 11:06:04, Harald Faber wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 10:14:16, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>4 normal positions I think Rebel is good, if not superior :-) >> >>You are invited to disproof.... >> >>=========================== >> >>[d]r2q3r/pp1k1pb1/3p3p/3P3n/5Bbp/2N5/PPPQN1P1/2K2R1R w - - 0 1 bm Bxd6; >> >>Rebel: 1.7 seconds (depth=5) > >Sure that this is the right solution? GambitTiger 2 finds Bxd6 after 22sec >(+0.16/10) but drops in favour of Nd4 at 1min32 and stays at this move for >>15min with +0.40/14 on my slow A-600. It is labeled in my database as a positional sacrifice, that should explain why some get it and others don't. Analysis... 00:00:01.3 0,66 5 141889 Bxd6 Bxc3 Nxc3 Kxd6 Rxf7 Bd7 Ne4+ Kc7 00:00:01.7 1,28 6 383448 Bxd6 Kc8 Bc5 Qa5 Rxh4 Bxe2 Qxe2 00:00:02.4 1,22 7 633724 Bxd6 Kc8 Qd3 Qxd6 Qc4+ Kb8 Qxg4 00:00:04.6 1,27 8 1668371 Bxd6 Kc8 Qd3 Bxe2 Nxe2 Qxd6 Qf5+ Kb8 00:00:11.0 1,26 9 6600859 Bxd6 f5 Bh2 00:00:27.0 1,32 10 18742174 Bxd6 f5 Bh2 00:01:05.4 1,05 11 47199462 Bxd6 f5 Bh2 00:03:58.7 1,08 12 180189836 Bxd6 f5 Bh2 Ed >Did you check whether Rebel drops Bxd6 too? >GT2 pv for Bxd6 is 1.Bxd6 f5 2.Bb4 Qg5 ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.