Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 10:21:31 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 03:01:01, Peter Berger wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 00:29:10, Uri Blass wrote: > >>The fact that tiger did no progress in the last moves is not a good reason to >>afjudicate it as a draw. >> >>Tiger has KRN vs K and the game should continue. >> >>Maybe tiger does not know to win KRN vs K but the 50 move rule are going to >>force it to sacrifice the knight and get KR vs K that it knows to win. >> >>I do not know about the knowledge of palm tiger but it is one possibility. >> >>Uri > >You are completely right and I came to the same conclusion. It was partly a >technical decision as I was really too tired to watch this game any longer. And >I expect exactly the same as you ( the Tiger sacrifices the knight because of >the 50 move rule and then will know how to mate). I think I will let them replay >this endgame (sigh). I'd suggest to do something more reasonable instead, Peter. I resign this one for Comet (if I'm allowed to) -:) I'd counted this as a loess anyway, Uli > >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.