Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Challenge for the weekend (2)

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 12:32:51 04/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On April 20, 2002 at 10:14:16, Ed Schröder wrote:

>4 normal positions I think Rebel is good, if not superior :-)
>
>You are invited to disproof....
>
>===========================
>
>[d]r2q3r/pp1k1pb1/3p3p/3P3n/5Bbp/2N5/PPPQN1P1/2K2R1R w - - 0 1 bm Bxd6;
>
>Rebel: 1.7 seconds (depth=5)

XiniX rounds the sec up, so it's les than 1 sec :) (watch the speed :))

ply:1/0 score:0,726 time:1s 0Kn/s
1.Bxd6 Kxd6 2.Rxf7

Tony

>
>
>[d]rn3rk1/1b3ppp/pq2p3/1p1pP3/3RNP2/4Q3/PPP1B1PP/1K5R w - - 0 1 bm Nf6+;
>
>Rebel: 4.1 seconds (depth=9)
>
>
>[d]r1bqr1k1/pp1n1ppp/5b2/4N1B1/3p3P/8/PPPQ1PP1/2K1RB1R w - - 0 1 bm Nxf7;
>
>Rebel: 3 seconds (depth=8)
>
>
>[d]6k1/8/p3r2p/1p1pPpp1/1n1pP3/1Pq4P/PR4PB/3QN1K1 b - - 0 1 bm dxe4;
>
>Rebel:  2.8 seconds (depth=8)
>
>A1400/60Mb hash.
>
>I will now search for 4 difficult positions Rebel is relative bad, I think.
>
>Ed

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.