Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 20:37:02 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 15:31:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >I would not tell "However to all standards, programming of DIEP is very >professionally done" about the programmer who needlessly duplicates tens of >megabytes of data only because he did not figured out how to efficiently use >threads instead of processes. this is bloody nonsense. Every idiot can proof that multiprocessing is faster and easier to implement! I added just sharing memory to DIEP and i was multiprocessor already (of course the algorithm to do so harder). Using threads i would have need to rewrite the entire program and evaluation and get slower everywhere. 10% slower i would estimate it at. >Or about the programmer who included others' code into his program without the >permission. >Eugene
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.