Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 20:40:16 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 23:15:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 23:14:30, Kevin Strickland wrote: > >>On April 20, 2002 at 20:19:21, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2002 at 15:31:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>I would not tell "However to all standards, programming of DIEP is very >>>>professionally done" about the programmer who needlessly duplicates tens of >>>>megabytes of data only because he did not figured out how to efficiently use >>>>threads instead of processes. >>>> >>>>Or about the programmer who included others' code into his program without the >>>>permission. >>>> >>>>Eugene >>> >>>Ouch. I guess it was only a matter of time......... >>> >> >>Also note no reply from Vincent... that really must have hurt. I felt it here. >> >>My only question is what code did he use in his program that he didn't get >>permission? If it was from a program like Crafty and I was Robert I would have a >>hard time letting one compete in tournaments with a program that included even >>one line of my code. >> >>Interesting question but doubtful I would ever get a serious response. >> >>Kevin. > > >Just speculation, but I would suspect Eugene was referring to the egtb.cpp >code... that probes his tablebases... He has no rights to anything. He is simply frustrated guy who can't program! Also he doesn't know shit from threads vs processes. I can easily share the shared memory and start another process. Making it multithreaded means i need to rewrite the entire fucking code, only a megabyte or 2 and also get 10% slower.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.