Author: Kevin Strickland
Date: 21:00:32 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 23:37:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 15:31:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>I would not tell "However to all standards, programming of DIEP is very >>professionally done" about the programmer who needlessly duplicates tens of >>megabytes of data only because he did not figured out how to efficiently use >>threads instead of processes. > >this is bloody nonsense. Every idiot can proof that multiprocessing >is faster and easier to implement! > >I added just sharing memory to DIEP and i was multiprocessor already >(of course the algorithm to do so harder). Using threads i would >have need to rewrite the entire program and evaluation and get >slower everywhere. 10% slower i would estimate it at. I don't think he was trying to discredit Intel at all. I took it as he was discreditting you. Unless you work suddenly for Intel.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.