Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 21:06:06 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
First, some time ago *you* wrote that you have to use 2 copies of EGTB cache and decompression tables because you uses processes, not threads. I would not call such the design "very professional done". Second, it took me exactly 15 seconds to find out how you can easily get back those 10% of the speed in your program. Third, of course I don't have access to the source of your chess program, but I can bet that your TB indexing code is exact copy of mine -- and any expert will say so, too. And forth, I gave permission to use my TB access code to *anyone* who asked. You are the only programmer who did not bother her/himself even to ask. Regards, Eugene On April 20, 2002 at 23:40:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 23:15:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 20, 2002 at 23:14:30, Kevin Strickland wrote: >> >>>On April 20, 2002 at 20:19:21, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On April 20, 2002 at 15:31:02, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>>> >>>>>I would not tell "However to all standards, programming of DIEP is very >>>>>professionally done" about the programmer who needlessly duplicates tens of >>>>>megabytes of data only because he did not figured out how to efficiently use >>>>>threads instead of processes. >>>>> >>>>>Or about the programmer who included others' code into his program without the >>>>>permission. >>>>> >>>>>Eugene >>>> >>>>Ouch. I guess it was only a matter of time......... >>>> >>> >>>Also note no reply from Vincent... that really must have hurt. I felt it here. >>> >>>My only question is what code did he use in his program that he didn't get >>>permission? If it was from a program like Crafty and I was Robert I would have a >>>hard time letting one compete in tournaments with a program that included even >>>one line of my code. >>> >>>Interesting question but doubtful I would ever get a serious response. >>> >>>Kevin. >> >> >>Just speculation, but I would suspect Eugene was referring to the egtb.cpp >>code... that probes his tablebases... > >He has no rights to anything. He is simply frustrated guy who >can't program! > >Also he doesn't know shit from threads vs processes. > >I can easily share the shared memory and start another process. > >Making it multithreaded means i need to rewrite the entire fucking code, >only a megabyte or 2 and also get 10% slower.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.